When reporting failure has consequences

Trust your numbers when it matters.We run your reporting so it’s reliable, on time, and defensible.

We connect to your systems, build and operate data pipelines, and run reporting end-to-end inside your environment. You don’t manage this. We do.

Teams call us when:

  • Reporting breaks under growth or system change
  • Different teams show different numbers
  • Deadlines are at risk
  • The person holding it together is gone

We connect systems

Automated pipelines replace fragile processes

We run reporting

Monitoring, fixes, new reports as needs change

No lock-in

Everything lives in your environment

The problem

Reporting doesn’t fail randomly.It fails the same way, every time.

It’s because the reporting chain can’t survive growth, complexity, or pressure.

Board pack is a negotiation

The same KPI shows up three different ways depending on who built the report. Meetings become reconciliation sessions instead of decisions.

Close takes longer as the business grows

More entities, locations, payers, SKUs, projects. Consolidation becomes manual stitching. The timeline drifts and the numbers arrive stale.

Billing and cash are leaking

WIP, A/R, charge capture, utilization, or SLA reporting doesn’t reconcile. Disputes rise. Cash predictability drops. The business bleeds quietly.

Reporting depends on a single person

One analyst knows the ‘real’ logic. One finance lead owns the macros. When they leave, everything stops or degrades immediately.

Why this happens

Disparate systems

ERP + CRM + billing + operations tools + spreadsheets. Reporting becomes a manual integration job.

Definition drift

“Revenue”, “margin”, “utilization”, “denials”, “SLA compliance” get redefined per team, per report, per month.

No accountable owner

Work is spread across IT, finance, ops, analysts, and vendors. When it breaks, nobody owns the outcome.

Trigger events that turn “annoying” into “urgent”

System change

ERP/PSA/EHR/RCM migration or upgrade breaks exports and definitions.

Ownership change

Acquisition, carve-out, new PE sponsor cadence, or tighter lender reporting.

Scale jump

New locations, entities, service lines, payers, or product lines multiply complexity.

Key person loss

The reporting owner quits, goes on leave, or burns out and the machine stalls.

Mid-market teams don’t fail because they lack tools.

They fail because nobody owns reporting delivery end-to-end: ingestion, definitions, and recurring outputs.When accountability is fractured, reliability becomes optional.

Trusted by

Companies who've replaced fragile reporting with reliable data foundations

Forensic Technology Inc logo
PE GI Solutions logo
Nextech Systems LLC logo
QueryBridge logo
ResponseMedia logo
Forensic Technology Inc logo
PE GI Solutions logo
Nextech Systems LLC logo
QueryBridge logo
ResponseMedia logo
Our Solution

We build and maintain your reporting system.

Tools are not the problem.The failure is that no one is accountable for ingestion, definitions, reliability, and recurring delivery together.You own the infrastructure. We do the work end-to-end and stay responsible for the result.

What this includes (and what it doesn’t)

What we do

  • • Connect to your source systems and build automated ingestion
  • • Model and standardize definitions so numbers don’t drift
  • • Build and rebuild recurring reports so they stay correct as the business changes
  • • Monitor and fix pipelines before deadlines and meetings expose failures
  • • Own delivery cadence for close, board, lender, audit, billing, and SLA cycles

What we do not do

  • • Advice-only engagements
  • • One-time dashboard builds
  • • Ad-hoc “analysis projects” without ownership of the system
  • • Staff augmentation or executing inside your internal plan
  • • Operating with no authority to standardize definitions

If accountability is split, reliability stays optional.

How it works

1

Stabilize

Identify the must-not-fail reports. Stop late or wrong numbers. Protect close, board, lender, billing, and SLA windows.

2

Build the system

Implement pipelines, definitions, and standardized recurring reporting inside your tenant so the process stops being fragile.

3

Maintain reliability

We monitor, fix, and adapt as systems and business logic change. Reporting stays on time and defensible every cycle.

No lock-in

Everything is built in your tenant under your accounts. If you bring it in-house later, nothing migrates. We simply stop maintaining it.

What you get

  • One accountable team

    A single team responsible for pipelines + definitions + recurring delivery.

  • Definition stability

    Revenue, margin, utilization, A/R, SLA metrics. Same meaning everywhere.

  • Reliability under change

    System updates, new fields, acquisitions. Breaks are detected and fixed before you feel them.

  • Deadline protection

    Close, board, lender, audit, renewals. Outputs show up on time with fewer fire drills.

Why this wins vs the usual options

Hiring

High fixed cost. Slow ramp. Often becomes a new single point of failure.

One-off consulting

They build, hand you docs, and leave. Reality changes. You inherit the breakage.

Build + maintain

We keep operating the system so reporting stays reliable without rebuilding every quarter.

You don’t need more tooling.

You need one team accountable for pipelines, definitions, and recurring delivery.

Who We Serve

Built for teams that want reporting off their plate

We connect to your systems, build and operate data pipelines, and run reporting inside your environment.We are accountable for reliability and on-time delivery.

Non-negotiable: we need access and authority to standardize definitions and operate the system.

You’re a fit if

Accountability gap is obvious

  • Reporting depends on tribal knowledge or one spreadsheet owner
  • No one is responsible for data intake, definitions, reliability, and delivery together
  • When systems change, numbers drift and no one knows where to fix it

Deadlines have consequences

  • Close, board packs, lender reporting, audit, payroll, or billing cannot slip
  • Customer SLA reporting affects renewals, penalties, or trust
  • Leadership challenges numbers and your team cannot defend them quickly

Complexity crossed a threshold

  • 5+ systems must reconcile (ERP, billing, CRM, ops tools, spreadsheets)
  • Multi-entity, multi-location, or PE reporting requirements
  • Growth turned manual workarounds into recurring fire drills

You want it off your plate

  • You want one team accountable for reporting reliability
  • You want continuity through turnover, migrations, and process change
  • You want reliable recurring reporting without building a data team

Not a fit if

  • You want a one-time dashboard build
  • You want advice or strategy decks, not execution
  • You want staff augmentation or someone to follow your internal plan
  • You are fine with late reporting or inconsistent definitions
  • You want to keep the work and risk in-house
  • You want us to operate without authority to standardize definitions
  • You want accountability without granting access or decision rights

Plain truth

If you want to keep control but outsource blame, nothing improves. One team must run reporting end-to-end with real authority.

This is for you if

You get blamed when the numbers are late, wrong, or indefensible.

Buyer mode

CFO / VP Finance

Owns close and credibility. Cannot walk into a board or lender call with unstable numbers.

  • Close packs break under pressure
  • Finance and Ops definitions do not match
  • Reporting depends on last-minute heroics

Buyer mode

COO / Head of Ops

Owns execution and customer commitments. Needs metrics that match reality.

  • SLA reporting affects renewals and penalties
  • Ops reports disagree with finance reports
  • System changes break operational visibility

Buyer mode

PE Operating Partner / Portfolio Leadership

Owns speed and standardization across companies.

  • Add-ons or carve-outs broke consolidation
  • KPI definitions vary by entity
  • Reporting maturity is required immediately

Common trigger events

System change: ERP, billing, PSA, CRM, or ops tooling change broke reporting.
New accountability: New CFO or COO inherits reporting risk.
M&A or restructuring: Consolidation made numbers stop tying out.
Key person loss: The reporting owner left and delivery stalled.
Deadline pressure: Board, close, audit, lender, or SLA deadline is imminent.
Trust collapse: Different teams bring different numbers to the same meeting.

If you’re in one of these situations, you don’t need more tooling. You need one team running reporting.

Don't wait until reporting failure costs you cash or credibility

If you're at a breaking point, let's talk.

If growth, change, or turnover just exposed the cracks, we can stabilize your reporting system in 60–90 days and keep it reliable.If you later bring it in-house, nothing migrates. We simply step back.

Which breaking point brought you here?

Scale jumped and your reporting system started failing under volume and complexity
Key person left and nobody can reproduce the numbers or keep delivery consistent
Two teams showed two truths in front of leadership, lenders, investors, or the board
Close or audit pressure spiked and you can’t risk late or indefensible numbers
Billing and cash predictability slipped because reconciliation and reporting don’t tie out
A system change broke reporting ERP, billing, CRM, PSA, RCM, or ops tool changes caused definition drift

Send a quick note with:

  • What broke: system change, scale, turnover, deadline pressure, trust collapse
  • Must-not-fail outputs: close pack, board pack, lender reporting, audit, billing, SLAs
  • Systems involved: ERP, CRM, billing, ops tools, spreadsheets, data feeds

We'll respond within one business day or tell you we're not the right fit.

60–90 day stabilizationBuilt in your tenantNo migration to exitLower cost than hiring